Company AI Risk Explorer
Loading the data…
Welcome to the Company AI Risk Explorer

This tool maps what large global companies say in public about AI risk. We reviewed public documents from roughly 200 of the world's largest companies. We coded every risk they acknowledge against the AI Risk Repository taxonomy.

Filter by company, sector, AI role, or risk. Compare what companies acknowledge against expert ratings of severity, sector vulnerability, and role responsibility.

← Back to the overview Company AI Risk Explorer

Companies × risks

Philip Morris International

Philip Morris International deploys AI at enterprise scale through Microsoft Copilot (with approximately 20,000 active users) and maintains a pipeline of internal GenAI use cases. It also develops domain-specific ML models internally for connected-device R&D and operational applications.

We reviewed 2 public documents from Philip Morris International and found it acknowledges 3 of 24 AI risks, including capability & robustness and discrimination.

Sector: Agriculture, Mining, Construction and Manufacturing; Other Agriculture, Mining, Construction and Manufacturing

Roles: AI deployer

AI risks Philip Morris International acknowledges

  • Capability & robustness: “some information technology systems may be supported by artificial intelligence capabilities that may not function as intended” (Philip Morris International 2024 Annual Report)
  • Discrimination: “This workstream will aim to mitigate, amongst others, risks such as: ... Amplification of bias” (The state of AI at PMI | PMI - Philip Morris International)
  • Transparency & interpretability: “This workstream will aim to mitigate, amongst others, risks such as: ... Lack of transparency and explainability” (The state of AI at PMI | PMI - Philip Morris International)

Documents we reviewed