Specifies safety requirements for generative AI services, focusing on corpus and model safety. Requires providers to conduct safety assessments and adhere to cybersecurity, data security, and personal information protection laws. Emphasizes preventing illegal content and ensuring model-generated content accuracy and reliability.
Good coverage — Comprehensive governance measures or mitigations with clear procedures relating to the risk subdomain are explicitly described.
Minimal coverage — Brief mention but no specific mitigations, recommendations or governance measures relating to the risk subdomain are described.
All other risk subdomains had no coverage in this document.
Risk Coverage Summary
The document has good coverage of approximately 12-14 subdomains, with strong focus on misinformation (3.1, 3.2), malicious actors (4.1, 4.2, 4.3), discrimination and toxicity (1.1, 1.2), privacy and security (2.1, 2.2), AI system safety (7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4), and governance (6.5). Coverage is concentrated in content safety, misuse prevention, and technical robustness domains.
Good coverage — Comprehensive governance measures or mitigations with clear procedures relating to the sector are explicitly described.
Minimal coverage — Brief mention but no specific mitigations, recommendations or governance measures relating to the sector are described.
All other sectors had no coverage in this document.
Sectors Summary
The document governs generative AI services across multiple high-risk sectors including healthcare, finance, critical infrastructure, and education. It provides sector-specific safety requirements for medical information services, psychological counseling, financial information services, automatic control, and services for minors. The regulation applies broadly to all generative AI service providers operating in China.
Hard Law
Legislative Status Summary
This is a binding technical standard issued by China's Standardization Administration that supports the Interim Measures for the Administration of Generative Artificial Intelligence Services. It contains mandatory requirements ('shall', 'must') with specific enforcement mechanisms including filing procedures, safety assessments, and compliance verification.
Proposer
Target
Enforcer
Monitor
Lifecycle stages covered by the documents, as defined in the OECD Framework for the Classification of AI Systems
AI Lifecycle Summary
The document comprehensively covers multiple AI lifecycle stages with primary focus on data collection/processing, model building, verification/validation, deployment, and operation/monitoring. It provides detailed requirements for corpus safety, model training, safety assessments, and ongoing monitoring of deployed systems.
Terms relating to technical scope that are mentioned or implicitly referenced in the document
Technical Scope Summary
The document explicitly covers generative AI services, AI models, and foundation models. It does not explicitly mention frontier AI, general purpose AI, task-specific AI, predictive AI, or compute thresholds. It addresses open-source models through corpus licensing requirements but does not use the term 'open-weight.' The focus is specifically on generative AI systems that produce text, graphics, audio, and video content.
Document data from AGORA, CSET Emerging Technology Observatory.