Indiana Senate Bill 2024-150

• Authority: Indiana
• Parent authority: State governments
• Jurisdiction: United States
• Collections: U.S. state and local documents
• Most recent activity: Enacted
• Most recent activity date: 2024-03-13

Risk subdomain coverage

Minimal coverage — Brief mention but no specific mitigations, recommendations or governance measures relating to the risk subdomain are described.

• Compromise of privacy
• AI system security vulnerabilities
• Increased inequality and decline in employment
• Governance failure
• Lack of capability or robustness
• Lack of transparency or interpretability

All other risk subdomains had no coverage in this document.

Risk Coverage Summary

The document has minimal coverage of risk domains, primarily addressing governance structures and procedural requirements rather than specific AI risks. It focuses on establishing oversight mechanisms (task force) and inventory requirements for state AI use, with implicit coverage of governance failure (6.5) through its creation of oversight structures. The document does not substantively address specific harms or risks from the MIT taxonomy.

Sector coverage

Good coverage — Comprehensive governance measures or mitigations with clear procedures relating to the sector are explicitly described.

• Public Administration (excl. National Security)

Minimal coverage — Brief mention but no specific mitigations, recommendations or governance measures relating to the sector are described.

• Scientific Research & Development Services
• Educational Services

All other sectors had no coverage in this document.

Sectors Summary

This document primarily governs AI use within Public Administration (state agencies, political subdivisions, legislative bodies). It also has minimal coverage of Educational Services through inclusion of school corporations and state educational institutions in cybersecurity policy provisions.

Legislative Status

Hard Law

Legislative Status Summary

This is a binding state statute enacted by the Indiana General Assembly with mandatory requirements for state agencies, including establishment of a task force and inventory requirements with specific deadlines.

Actors

Proposer

• Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
• Entities: Indiana General Assembly; State of Indiana
• Summary: The bill is enacted by the Indiana General Assembly as indicated in the opening clause and represents state legislative action.

Target

• Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor, AI_Deployer
• Entities: State agencies of Indiana; Political subdivisions; School corporations; State educational institutions; Public entities
• Summary: The bill primarily targets state agencies requiring them to inventory AI technologies and establishes governance structures. It also applies to broader public entities for cybersecurity policies.

Enforcer

• Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
• Entities: Office of Technology; Legislative Services Agency; Artificial Intelligence Task Force
• Summary: The Office of Technology is designated to receive inventories and prescribe forms. The Legislative Services Agency staffs the task force. The task force has oversight and recommendation authority.

Monitor

• Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
• Entities: Artificial Intelligence Task Force; Office of Technology; Legislative Services Agency
• Summary: The task force is explicitly charged with studying AI use by state agencies, assessing benefits and risks, and issuing annual reports. The Office receives and maintains inventories.

AI Lifecycle Stages

Lifecycle stages covered by the documents, as defined in the OECD Framework for the Classification of AI Systems

• Plan and Design
• Collect and Process Data
• Build and Use Model
• Verify and Validate
• Deploy
• Operate and Monitor

AI Lifecycle Summary

The document addresses multiple AI lifecycle stages with primary focus on deployment and operational monitoring. It requires inventorying AI technologies in use, being developed, or considered for use, covering planning, development, deployment, and monitoring stages. The inventory requirements span the full lifecycle from consideration through ongoing operation.

Technical Scope

Terms relating to technical scope that are mentioned or implicitly referenced in the document

No technical scope terms identified.

Technical Scope Summary

The document explicitly defines and covers 'artificial intelligence' and 'artificial intelligence technology' broadly. It does not distinguish between AI models and AI systems, frontier AI, general purpose AI, or other specific AI categories. No compute thresholds or model-specific classifications are mentioned.