Oregon House Bill 4153

• Authority: Oregon
• Parent authority: State governments
• Jurisdiction: United States
• Collections: U.S. state and local documents
• Most recent activity: Enacted
• Most recent activity date: 2024-03-27

Risk subdomain coverage

All other risk subdomains had no coverage in this document.

Risk Coverage Summary

This document establishes a task force to examine AI terminology and definitions for future legislation. It does not directly address specific AI risks or harms. The document focuses on governance process and definitional work rather than substantive risk mitigation. No risk subdomains receive coverage scores above 1.

Sector coverage

Good coverage — Comprehensive governance measures or mitigations with clear procedures relating to the sector are explicitly described.

• Public Administration (excl. National Security)

Minimal coverage — Brief mention but no specific mitigations, recommendations or governance measures relating to the sector are described.

• Educational Services

All other sectors had no coverage in this document.

Sectors Summary

This document does not govern AI use in specific economic sectors. It establishes a task force to examine AI terminology and definitions for future legislation. The task force includes representatives from various sectors (business, education, government) as stakeholders providing input, but the document does not regulate AI activities within those sectors.

Legislative Status

Hard Law

Legislative Status Summary

This is a binding state legislative act with mandatory language establishing a task force, with legal authority derived from the Oregon Legislative Assembly and declaring an emergency for immediate effect.

Actors

Proposer

• Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
• Summary: This is a House Bill from the Oregon state legislature, proposed through the standard legislative process. The document is enacted 'by the People of the State of Oregon' through their legislative representatives.

Target

• Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
• Summary: The legislation establishes and applies to a specific task force with defined membership from various government branches and stakeholder groups. State agencies are explicitly directed to assist the task force.

Enforcer

• Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
• Summary: The Legislative Assembly receives the task force report and has authority over the task force through the appointing process and staff support. The Legislative Policy and Research Director provides oversight through staff support.

Monitor

• Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
• Summary: The task force must report to a specific legislative interim committee by December 1, 2024, and the Legislative Policy and Research Director provides staff support, implying monitoring and oversight functions.

AI Lifecycle Stages

Lifecycle stages covered by the documents, as defined in the OECD Framework for the Classification of AI Systems

No lifecycle stages identified.

AI Lifecycle Summary

This document does not directly govern specific AI lifecycle stages. It establishes a task force to examine AI terminology and definitions for future legislation. The task force's work is preparatory and definitional rather than regulatory of actual AI development or deployment activities.

Technical Scope

Terms relating to technical scope that are mentioned or implicitly referenced in the document

No technical scope terms identified.

Technical Scope Summary

The document mentions artificial intelligence in general terms as the subject of the task force's examination but does not define or specifically address AI models, systems, or any technical categories. The task force is directed to examine and identify AI-related terms and definitions, but the document itself does not contain such definitions.