Defines "computer-generated child pornography" to include AI-generated images indistinguishable from minors in sexual acts. Criminalizes possession, distribution, and manufacturing of such content, with severe felony penalties. Prohibits defenses based on consent or age mistake. Recognizes mitigating sentencing circumstances.
Good coverage — Comprehensive governance measures or mitigations with clear procedures relating to the risk subdomain are explicitly described.
All other risk subdomains had no coverage in this document.
Risk Coverage Summary
The document primarily addresses risks related to malicious actors (4.3 Fraud, scams, and targeted manipulation) through criminalization of AI-generated child pornography. It has minimal coverage of AI system safety failures (7.3 Lack of robustness) through implicit recognition that AI systems can create harmful content. The document does not substantively address governance structures, discrimination, privacy, misinformation, or other risk domains.
Minimal coverage — Brief mention but no specific mitigations, recommendations or governance measures relating to the sector are described.
All other sectors had no coverage in this document.
Sectors Summary
This criminal statute applies across all sectors where individuals or organizations might create, possess, or distribute AI-generated child pornography. It is sector-agnostic criminal law that would apply to any person or entity regardless of industry. The law primarily governs individual conduct rather than specific economic sectors.
Hard Law
Legislative Status Summary
This is a binding state statute with mandatory criminal penalties, enforcement through the criminal justice system, and explicit felony classifications with mandatory minimum sentences.
Proposer
Target
Enforcer
Monitor
Lifecycle stages covered by the documents, as defined in the OECD Framework for the Classification of AI Systems
AI Lifecycle Summary
The document does not explicitly address specific AI lifecycle stages. It focuses on criminalizing the outputs (AI-generated child pornography) rather than regulating the development, deployment, or operation of AI systems. The legislation is output-focused rather than process-focused.
Terms relating to technical scope that are mentioned or implicitly referenced in the document
Technical Scope Summary
The document explicitly mentions artificial intelligence and computer technology in the context of creating visual depictions. It does not reference AI models, AI systems, or any specific categories of AI (frontier, general purpose, task-specific, foundation models, generative AI, etc.). No compute thresholds or open-weight models are mentioned.
Document data from AGORA, CSET Emerging Technology Observatory.