Encourages industry self-regulation through the establishment of AI safety and risk management teams, rigorous model testing, data protection measures, infrastructure security, enhanced transparency, and safety research. Signed by major companies, including Alibaba, Baidu, Huawei, Tencent, and others, to uphold AI for good principles.
Good coverage — Comprehensive governance measures or mitigations with clear procedures relating to the risk subdomain are explicitly described.
Minimal coverage — Brief mention but no specific mitigations, recommendations or governance measures relating to the risk subdomain are described.
All other risk subdomains had no coverage in this document.
Risk Coverage Summary
The document has good coverage of approximately 10-12 subdomains, with strong focus on AI system security (2.2), privacy protection (2.1), lack of robustness (7.3), lack of transparency (7.4), governance failure (6.5), competitive dynamics (6.4), and malicious actors risks (4.1, 4.2, 4.3). Coverage is concentrated in security, safety testing, transparency, and risk management domains.
Good coverage — Comprehensive governance measures or mitigations with clear procedures relating to the sector are explicitly described.
Minimal coverage — Brief mention but no specific mitigations, recommendations or governance measures relating to the sector are described.
All other sectors had no coverage in this document.
Sectors Summary
This is an internal corporate policy document (industry self-regulation commitment) signed by major Chinese AI companies. The primary sector governed is Information (where the signatory AI companies operate). The document also explicitly mentions AI applications in five critical sectors: industry/manufacturing, education, healthcare, finance, and law, giving these sectors minimal coverage (score 2).
Soft Law
Legislative Status Summary
This is a voluntary industry self-regulation commitment with no binding legal obligations, enforcement mechanisms, or penalties. The document uses voluntary language throughout and relies on industry cooperation and reputational incentives.
Proposer
Target
Enforcer
Monitor
Lifecycle stages covered by the documents, as defined in the OECD Framework for the Classification of AI Systems
AI Lifecycle Summary
The document covers the entire AI lifecycle from development through deployment and operation. It emphasizes risk management throughout the lifecycle, with particular focus on pre-release testing, data security during training and operation, infrastructure security, and post-deployment monitoring and transparency.
Terms relating to technical scope that are mentioned or implicitly referenced in the document
Technical Scope Summary
The document explicitly mentions AI models and AI systems throughout. It specifically addresses large models and frontier applications including agents based on large models and embodied intelligence. There is no explicit mention of compute thresholds, general purpose AI, task-specific AI, foundation models, or open-weight/open-source models, though open-source initiatives are briefly referenced.
Document data from AGORA, CSET Emerging Technology Observatory.