Enable Intelligence Community Partnerships Act of 2024

• Authority: United States Congress
• Parent authority: Federal government
• Jurisdiction: United States
• Collections: U.S. federal laws
• Most recent activity: Defunct
• Most recent activity date: 2025-01-03

Risk subdomain coverage

Minimal coverage — Brief mention but no specific mitigations, recommendations or governance measures relating to the risk subdomain are described.

• Competitive dynamics
• Governance failure

All other risk subdomains had no coverage in this document.

Risk Coverage Summary

The document has minimal coverage of AI risk domains, with limited focus on competitive dynamics (6.4) and governance failure (6.5). The document primarily addresses organizational and procedural matters for intelligence community partnerships rather than specific AI risks. Coverage is concentrated in socioeconomic domains related to strategic competition and governance structures.

Sector coverage

Good coverage — Comprehensive governance measures or mitigations with clear procedures relating to the sector are explicitly described.

• National Security

Minimal coverage — Brief mention but no specific mitigations, recommendations or governance measures relating to the sector are described.

• Agriculture, Mining, Construction & Manufacturing
• Information
• Finance & Insurance
• Professional & Technical Services
• Scientific Research & Development Services

All other sectors had no coverage in this document.

Sectors Summary

The document primarily governs Public Administration (National Security) as it regulates intelligence community operations and partnerships. It also has minimal coverage of Professional and Technical Services, Scientific Research and Development Services, and Information sectors through its provisions for private-sector partnerships in technology fields including AI, cybersecurity, and computing.

Legislative Status

Hard Law

Legislative Status Summary

This is a binding legislative act passed by the United States Congress with mandatory requirements, enforcement mechanisms, and reporting obligations.

Actors

Proposer

• Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
• Entities: United States Congress; Senate and House of Representatives
• Summary: The document is enacted by the United States Congress, as stated in the opening clause. This is a legislative act proposed and passed by the federal legislative body.

Target

• Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor, AI_Developer
• Entities: intelligence community; Director of National Intelligence; private-sector organizations; Office of Strategic Capital of the Office of the Secretary of Defense; Office of Domestic Finance of the Department of the Treasury
• Summary: The document targets the intelligence community and its elements, requiring them to establish talent exchange programs with private-sector organizations in AI and other technology fields. Private-sector organizations in specified technology fields are also targets as participants in the exchange program.

Enforcer

• Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
• Entities: Director of National Intelligence; heads of intelligence community elements
• Summary: The Director of National Intelligence is responsible for ensuring implementation of policies and procedures, while heads of intelligence community elements must implement systems to manage organizational conflicts of interest.

Monitor

• Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
• Entities: congressional intelligence committees; Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; Director of National Intelligence
• Summary: Congressional committees receive annual reports on implementation and administration. The Director of National Intelligence is responsible for monitoring and reporting on the program's implementation.

AI Lifecycle Stages

Lifecycle stages covered by the documents, as defined in the OECD Framework for the Classification of AI Systems

No lifecycle stages identified.

AI Lifecycle Summary

The document does not explicitly address specific AI lifecycle stages. It focuses on organizational talent exchange programs and partnerships rather than technical AI development processes. The document mentions AI as one of several technology focus areas for personnel exchanges but does not govern AI development, deployment, or monitoring activities.

Technical Scope

Terms relating to technical scope that are mentioned or implicitly referenced in the document

No technical scope terms identified.

Technical Scope Summary

The document mentions artificial intelligence only as one of several technology fields for talent exchange programs. It does not define AI models, systems, or any specific AI technical concepts. The focus is on organizational partnerships and personnel exchanges rather than technical AI governance.