Louisiana (2024) HCR 66

• Authority: Louisiana
• Parent authority: State governments
• Jurisdiction: United States
• Collections: U.S. state and local documents
• Most recent activity: Enacted
• Most recent activity date: 2024-05-31

Risk subdomain coverage

Minimal coverage — Brief mention but no specific mitigations, recommendations or governance measures relating to the risk subdomain are described.

• AI system security vulnerabilities
• False or misleading information
• Disinformation, surveillance, and influence at scale
• Cyberattacks, weapon development or use
• Fraud, scams, and targeted manipulation
• Governance failure
• Lack of capability or robustness
• Lack of transparency or interpretability

All other risk subdomains had no coverage in this document.

Risk Coverage Summary

The document has minimal coverage of approximately 6-8 subdomains, with implicit references to malicious actors (4.1, 4.2, 4.3), misinformation (3.1), governance (6.5), and system safety (7.3). Coverage is primarily through general risk acknowledgment rather than detailed risk analysis or mitigation measures.

Sector coverage

Minimal coverage — Brief mention but no specific mitigations, recommendations or governance measures relating to the sector are described.

• Finance & Insurance
• Educational Services
• Health Care & Social Assistance
• Public Administration (excl. National Security)

All other sectors had no coverage in this document.

Sectors Summary

The document requests study of AI use and regulation across multiple sectors including Educational Services, Public Administration (criminal justice), Finance and Insurance, and Health Care and Social Assistance. The resolution identifies potential AI impacts in these sectors but does not yet establish governance measures.

Legislative Status

Soft Law

Legislative Status Summary

This is a concurrent resolution that requests a legislative committee to study and make recommendations regarding AI use and regulation. It contains no binding obligations, enforcement mechanisms, or penalties, relying entirely on voluntary language.

Actors

Proposer

• Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
• Entities: Legislature of Louisiana
• Summary: The document is a concurrent resolution proposed by the Louisiana Legislature, as indicated by the title and resolving clauses.

Target

• Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
• Entities: Joint Legislative Committee on Technology and Cybersecurity
• Summary: The resolution directs the Joint Legislative Committee on Technology and Cybersecurity to study and make recommendations regarding AI use and regulation.

Enforcer

• Summary: No enforcement mechanisms or enforcement bodies are specified in this resolution. It is a request for study and recommendations, not a binding regulation.

Monitor

• Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
• Entities: Joint Legislative Committee on Technology and Cybersecurity; Legislature of Louisiana
• Summary: The Joint Legislative Committee is tasked with making annual reports on policy recommendations to the legislature, establishing a monitoring and reporting relationship.

AI Lifecycle Stages

Lifecycle stages covered by the documents, as defined in the OECD Framework for the Classification of AI Systems

• Deploy
• Operate and Monitor

AI Lifecycle Summary

The document does not focus on specific AI lifecycle stages but rather broadly addresses the need to study AI use and regulation across multiple potential applications. It implicitly covers all lifecycle stages through its comprehensive study mandate.

Technical Scope

Terms relating to technical scope that are mentioned or implicitly referenced in the document

No technical scope terms identified.

Technical Scope Summary

The document uses the general term 'artificial intelligence' throughout without defining it or distinguishing between different types of AI systems, models, or capabilities. No technical specifications, compute thresholds, or model types are mentioned.