Wisconsin AB 1068 (Relating to: use of artificial intelligence by state agencies and staff reduction goals. (FE))

• Authority: Wisconsin
• Parent authority: State governments
• Jurisdiction: United States
• Collections: U.S. state and local documents
• Most recent activity: Defunct
• Most recent activity date: 2024-04-15

Risk subdomain coverage

Minimal coverage — Brief mention but no specific mitigations, recommendations or governance measures relating to the risk subdomain are described.

• Compromise of privacy
• Lack of capability or robustness
• Lack of transparency or interpretability

All other risk subdomains had no coverage in this document.

Risk Coverage Summary

The document has minimal coverage of approximately 3-4 risk subdomains, primarily focused on privacy protection (2.1), system performance and robustness (7.3), and transparency (7.4). Coverage is concentrated in operational governance and accountability rather than specific AI safety or societal risks.

Sector coverage

Good coverage — Comprehensive governance measures or mitigations with clear procedures relating to the sector are explicitly described.

• Public Administration (excl. National Security)

All other sectors had no coverage in this document.

Sectors Summary

This legislation exclusively governs AI use within Wisconsin state government agencies, falling squarely within Public Administration. It does not regulate AI use in private sector industries or other economic sectors.

Legislative Status

Hard Law

Legislative Status Summary

This is a Wisconsin state statute creating binding legal obligations on state agencies to report on AI usage and undergo audits, with mandatory compliance language throughout.

Actors

Proposer

• Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
• Summary: The document begins with the standard legislative enactment clause indicating this is proposed legislation from the Wisconsin Legislature.

Target

• Entity Types: AI_Deployer, AI_Governance_Actor
• Summary: The legislation explicitly defines 'Agency' as the regulated entities who must report on their AI tool usage and are subject to audit requirements.

Enforcer

• Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
• Summary: Multiple state government entities are designated to receive reports, conduct audits, and oversee compliance with the AI reporting requirements.

Monitor

• Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
• Summary: The Legislative Audit Bureau is specifically tasked with conducting audits, while the Department aggregates reports, and legislative committees receive ongoing monitoring reports.

AI Lifecycle Stages

Lifecycle stages covered by the documents, as defined in the OECD Framework for the Classification of AI Systems

• Plan and Design
• Collect and Process Data
• Build and Use Model
• Verify and Validate
• Deploy
• Operate and Monitor

AI Lifecycle Summary

The document covers multiple lifecycle stages with primary focus on deployment and operational monitoring of AI tools already in use by state agencies. It also addresses development activities and evaluation/validation through required performance assessments.

Technical Scope

Terms relating to technical scope that are mentioned or implicitly referenced in the document

• AI Models
• AI Systems
• Generative AI

Technical Scope Summary

The document explicitly defines 'artificial intelligence tool' and mentions specific AI technologies including generative AI, large language models, and machine learning. It does not mention frontier AI, general purpose AI, foundation models, compute thresholds, or open-source models.