National AI Commission Act

Establishes the National AI Commission, an independent and bi-partisan commission in the legislative branch responsible for reviewing and recommending measures to mitigate AI risks and protect US leadership in AI development

  • Authority: United States Congress
  • Parent authority: Federal government
  • Jurisdiction: United States
  • Collections: U.S. federal laws
  • Most recent activity: Defunct
  • Most recent activity date: 2025-01-03

Risk subdomain coverage

Minimal coverage — Brief mention but no specific mitigations, recommendations or governance measures relating to the risk subdomain are described.

  • Competitive dynamics
  • Governance failure
  • AI pursuing its own goals
  • AI possessing dangerous capabilities

All other risk subdomains had no coverage in this document.

Risk Coverage Summary

The document has minimal to no specific coverage of individual risk subdomains. While it broadly references 'risks and possible harms of artificial intelligence' and mentions developing risk-based regulatory approaches, it does not explicitly address specific risk categories from the taxonomy. The document is procedural, establishing a commission structure rather than detailing specific AI risks or mitigation measures.

Sector coverage

Minimal coverage — Brief mention but no specific mitigations, recommendations or governance measures relating to the sector are described.

  • Public Administration (excl. National Security)
  • National Security

All other sectors had no coverage in this document.

Sectors Summary

This document does not govern specific economic sectors. It establishes a commission to review federal AI oversight across all sectors and recommend comprehensive regulatory frameworks. The Commission's work will span all sectors where AI is used, but the Act itself does not impose sector-specific governance measures.

Legislative Status

Hard Law

Legislative Status Summary

This is a binding legislative act passed by the United States Congress establishing a National AI Commission with specific mandates, composition requirements, timelines, and reporting obligations. The document uses mandatory language throughout and creates legally enforceable obligations.

Actors

Proposer

  • Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
  • Summary: The document is a Congressional bill introduced by specific members of the House of Representatives, establishing it as proposed by legislative actors with governance authority.

Target

  • Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
  • Summary: The Act primarily targets federal government entities that will be subject to the Commission's review and must provide information to it. The Commission itself is also a target as it must fulfill specific mandates.

Enforcer

  • Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
  • Summary: Congress maintains enforcement authority through oversight of the Commission's activities and is notified if the Commission cannot obtain necessary information. The Commission itself has authority to request information from federal entities.

Monitor

  • Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
  • Summary: The Commission is established to monitor and review federal AI oversight approaches. Congress and the President receive reports from the Commission, enabling them to monitor the Commission's work and the state of AI governance.

AI Lifecycle Stages

Lifecycle stages covered by the documents, as defined in the OECD Framework for the Classification of AI Systems

  • Plan and Design
  • Build and Use Model
  • Verify and Validate
  • Deploy
  • Operate and Monitor

AI Lifecycle Summary

The document does not focus on specific AI lifecycle stages but rather establishes a commission to review and recommend regulatory approaches across all stages. It implicitly covers all lifecycle stages through its mandate to review federal AI oversight comprehensively and develop risk-based regulatory frameworks.

Technical Scope

Terms relating to technical scope that are mentioned or implicitly referenced in the document

  • AI Systems
  • General Purpose AI

Technical Scope Summary

The document uses general terminology referring to 'artificial intelligence' and 'artificial intelligence systems' without defining specific technical categories. It mentions 'powerful artificial intelligence systems with a general purpose' but does not explicitly define frontier AI, foundation models, or compute thresholds.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/4223
https://agora.eto.tech/instrument/450
Explore in the Document View

Document data from AGORA, CSET Emerging Technology Observatory.