California SB 384 (Preventing Algorithmic Price Fixing Act: Prohibition on Certain Price-Setting Algorithm Uses 2025)

Prohibits the use, sale, or licensing of price-setting algorithms processing nonpublic data if intended for competitors in the same market. Assigns enforcement to the Attorney General and others, allowing penalties per violation. Defines 'artificial intelligence' for regulatory purposes.

  • Authority: California
  • Parent authority: State governments
  • Jurisdiction: United States
  • Collections: U.S. state and local documents
  • Most recent activity: Proposed
  • Most recent activity date: 2025-02-14

Risk subdomain coverage

Good coverage — Comprehensive governance measures or mitigations with clear procedures relating to the risk subdomain are explicitly described.

  • Competitive dynamics

Minimal coverage — Brief mention but no specific mitigations, recommendations or governance measures relating to the risk subdomain are described.

  • Compromise of privacy
  • AI system security vulnerabilities
  • Governance failure
  • Lack of transparency or interpretability

All other risk subdomains had no coverage in this document.

Risk Coverage Summary

The document primarily addresses competitive dynamics (6.4) through its focus on preventing algorithmic collusion and price-fixing. It has minimal coverage of AI system security (2.2) through references to algorithm vulnerabilities, and touches on governance failure (6.5) by establishing regulatory frameworks. The document is narrowly focused on economic competition risks rather than broader AI safety or societal concerns.

Sector coverage

Good coverage — Comprehensive governance measures or mitigations with clear procedures relating to the sector are explicitly described.

  • Real Estate, Rental & Leasing

Minimal coverage — Brief mention but no specific mitigations, recommendations or governance measures relating to the sector are described.

  • Agriculture, Mining, Construction & Manufacturing
  • Trade, Transportation & Utilities
  • Information
  • Finance & Insurance
  • Professional & Technical Services
  • Scientific Research & Development Services
  • Management, Administrative & Support Services
  • Health Care & Social Assistance
  • Arts, Entertainment & Recreation
  • Accommodation, Food & Other Services

All other sectors had no coverage in this document.

Sectors Summary

The document governs AI use across multiple economic sectors where pricing algorithms could be deployed, with explicit coverage of real estate rental markets and implicit coverage of any sector involving competitors offering goods or services. The regulation is sector-agnostic in its prohibition of algorithmic price-fixing, applying broadly to trade, finance, professional services, and other commercial activities.

Legislative Status

Hard Law

Legislative Status Summary

This is a binding California state statute with mandatory prohibitions, civil penalties up to $1,000 per violation, and enforcement by the Attorney General and other government authorities.

Actors

Proposer

  • Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
  • Entities: State of California; California State Legislature
  • Summary: The document is a California state statute enacted by the people of California through their legislature, as indicated by the opening phrase and legislative structure.

Target

  • Entity Types: AI_Developer, AI_Deployer
  • Summary: The statute targets persons who sell, license, provide, or use price-setting algorithms, which includes both developers/providers of such algorithms and deployers/users who implement them in competitive markets.

Enforcer

  • Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
  • Entities: Attorney General of California; District Attorney; City Attorney; County Counsel
  • Summary: The statute explicitly designates multiple government legal authorities at state and local levels as enforcers who may file civil actions for violations.

Monitor

  • Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
  • Entities: Attorney General of California; District Attorney; City Attorney; County Counsel
  • Summary: While not explicitly designated as monitors, the enforcement authorities (Attorney General, district attorneys, city attorneys, and county counsel) implicitly serve monitoring functions through their authority to investigate and bring civil actions for violations.

AI Lifecycle Stages

Lifecycle stages covered by the documents, as defined in the OECD Framework for the Classification of AI Systems

  • Collect and Process Data
  • Verify and Validate
  • Deploy
  • Operate and Monitor

AI Lifecycle Summary

The document primarily covers the Deploy and Operate and Monitor stages, as it regulates the use and provision of price-setting algorithms in commercial markets and requires due diligence in their deployment. It does not address earlier stages like data collection, model training, or validation.

Technical Scope

Terms relating to technical scope that are mentioned or implicitly referenced in the document

  • AI Systems
  • Predictive AI
  • Task-specific AI

Technical Scope Summary

The document explicitly defines and covers AI systems through its definition of 'artificial intelligence' and 'price-setting algorithm.' It focuses on task-specific AI (price-setting algorithms) rather than general-purpose AI. No compute thresholds or references to frontier AI, foundation models, or open-weight models are mentioned.

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB384
https://agora.eto.tech/instrument/4963
Explore in the Document View

Document data from AGORA, CSET Emerging Technology Observatory.