STOP HATE Act of 2023

• Authority: United States Congress
• Parent authority: Federal government
• Jurisdiction: United States
• Collections: U.S. federal laws
• Most recent activity: Defunct
• Most recent activity date: 2025-01-03

Risk subdomain coverage

Good coverage — Comprehensive governance measures or mitigations with clear procedures relating to the risk subdomain are explicitly described.

• Disinformation, surveillance, and influence at scale
• Governance failure

Minimal coverage — Brief mention but no specific mitigations, recommendations or governance measures relating to the risk subdomain are described.

• Exposure to toxic content

All other risk subdomains had no coverage in this document.

Risk Coverage Summary

The document has minimal to good coverage of approximately 5-6 subdomains, with primary focus on disinformation and surveillance (4.1), information pollution (3.2), governance failure (6.5), and lack of transparency (7.4). Coverage is concentrated in malicious actors, misinformation, and AI system transparency domains.

Sector coverage

Good coverage — Comprehensive governance measures or mitigations with clear procedures relating to the sector are explicitly described.

• Information

Minimal coverage — Brief mention but no specific mitigations, recommendations or governance measures relating to the sector are described.

• National Security

All other sectors had no coverage in this document.

Sectors Summary

The document primarily governs the Information sector, specifically social media platforms and technology companies that operate digital communication services. It does not substantially regulate other economic sectors.

Legislative Status

Hard Law

Legislative Status Summary

This is a binding federal statute with mandatory compliance requirements, civil penalties for violations, and enforcement authority granted to the Attorney General.

Actors

Proposer

• Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
• Summary: The document is a bill introduced in the House of Representatives by named congressional representatives, referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

Target

• Entity Types: AI_Deployer
• Summary: The legislation explicitly targets social media companies that own or operate platforms meeting specific user threshold requirements and are subject to FTC jurisdiction.

Enforcer

• Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
• Summary: The Attorney General is explicitly granted enforcement authority including the power to impose civil penalties and publish compliance reports. The FTC has jurisdictional authority over covered entities.

Monitor

• Entity Types: AI_Governance_Actor
• Summary: Multiple government entities are assigned monitoring and reporting responsibilities, including the Attorney General for compliance reports, the DNI for intelligence assessments, and the Comptroller General for implementation reviews.

AI Lifecycle Stages

Lifecycle stages covered by the documents, as defined in the OECD Framework for the Classification of AI Systems

• Deploy
• Operate and Monitor

AI Lifecycle Summary

The document primarily addresses the Deploy and Operate and Monitor stages of the AI lifecycle, focusing on transparency requirements for how AI systems are used in content moderation. It does not substantially cover earlier stages like planning, data collection, or model building.

Technical Scope

Terms relating to technical scope that are mentioned or implicitly referenced in the document

• AI Systems

Technical Scope Summary

The document explicitly mentions artificial intelligence in the context of content moderation systems used by social media platforms. It does not define AI models, AI systems, or specify any particular type of AI (frontier, general purpose, task-specific, etc.). No compute thresholds or model architecture details are mentioned.