Appropriates $1,090,000,000 to U.S. Customs and Border Protection for technology improvements to enhance fentanyl interdiction. Appropriates $223,000,000 to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to expand fentanyl interdiction and disrupt transnational criminal networks. Mandates submission of reports by March 31, 2028, on impacts of Border Patrol Processing Coordinator positions and equipment needs. Creates penalties for damaging or evading border controls, with fines and imprisonment up to 5 years for violations aimed at financial gain or furthering criminal organizations.
All other risk subdomains had no coverage in this document.
Risk Coverage Summary
This document has minimal to no coverage of AI-related risks. It is a border security and law enforcement appropriations bill focused on fentanyl interdiction, with no substantive discussion of AI systems, AI risks, or AI governance. The only potential AI-related mention is a brief reference to 'anomaly detection algorithms' for scanning technology, which does not constitute coverage of AI risks as defined in the taxonomy.
Good coverage — Comprehensive governance measures or mitigations with clear procedures relating to the sector are explicitly described.
Minimal coverage — Brief mention but no specific mitigations, recommendations or governance measures relating to the sector are described.
All other sectors had no coverage in this document.
Sectors Summary
This document primarily governs the Public Administration excluding National Security sector through appropriations and mandates for federal law enforcement agencies. It also has minimal coverage of the National Security sector through border control and defense-related activities.
Hard Law
Legislative Status Summary
This is a binding federal appropriations act passed by the United States Congress with mandatory funding allocations and criminal penalties for violations, including fines and imprisonment up to 5 years.
Proposer
Target
Enforcer
Monitor
Lifecycle stages covered by the documents, as defined in the OECD Framework for the Classification of AI Systems
No lifecycle stages identified.
AI Lifecycle Summary
This document does not govern AI systems or the AI lifecycle. It is a border security appropriations bill that briefly mentions 'anomaly detection algorithms' as one potential use of technology funding, but provides no governance of AI development, deployment, or monitoring processes.
Terms relating to technical scope that are mentioned or implicitly referenced in the document
No technical scope terms identified.
Technical Scope Summary
The document does not explicitly mention or define any AI-specific technical concepts. The only AI-related reference is a brief mention of 'anomaly detection algorithms' as a potential technological improvement for scanning systems, with no further elaboration on AI models, systems, or governance.
Document data from AGORA, CSET Emerging Technology Observatory.