Requires operators of conversational AI services to disclose AI status to all users, apply added safeguards for minors, such as preventing sexually explicit content and simulated emotional dependence, and implement suicide and self-harm crisis-referral protocols. Prohibits presenting outputs as provided by or equivalent to licensed professionals, and requires annual reporting to the Attorney General on crisis referrals and related protocols.
Good coverage — Comprehensive governance measures or mitigations with clear procedures relating to the risk subdomain are explicitly described.
Minimal coverage — Brief mention but no specific mitigations, recommendations or governance measures relating to the risk subdomain are described.
All other risk subdomains had no coverage in this document.
Risk Coverage Summary
The document has good coverage of approximately 5-6 subdomains, with strong focus on toxic content exposure (1.2), overreliance and unsafe use (5.1), lack of transparency (7.4), and moderate coverage of fraud/manipulation (4.3), privacy compromise (2.1), loss of agency (5.2), and lack of robustness (7.3). Coverage is concentrated in human-computer interaction harms and content safety domains.
Good coverage — Comprehensive governance measures or mitigations with clear procedures relating to the sector are explicitly described.
Minimal coverage — Brief mention but no specific mitigations, recommendations or governance measures relating to the sector are described.
All other sectors had no coverage in this document.
Sectors Summary
The document primarily governs the Information sector, specifically operators of conversational AI services that provide data processing and interactive software services to the general public. Through its extensive exclusions, the document explicitly does NOT govern AI use in Healthcare, Educational Services, Professional Services, Arts/Entertainment (video games, theme parks), or internal business operations.
Hard Law
Legislative Status Summary
This is a binding state statute enacted by the Colorado General Assembly with mandatory obligations using 'SHALL' and 'SHALL NOT' language throughout, specific enforcement mechanisms through the Attorney General's office, and formal legislative adoption with defined effective dates.
Proposer
Target
Enforcer
Monitor
Lifecycle stages covered by the documents, as defined in the OECD Framework for the Classification of AI Systems
AI Lifecycle Summary
The document primarily focuses on the Deploy and Operate and Monitor lifecycle stages, with obligations applying to conversational AI services that are actively deployed and accessible to the general public. The requirements include ongoing operational safeguards, disclosure protocols, crisis response mechanisms, and annual monitoring reports.
Terms relating to technical scope that are mentioned or implicitly referenced in the document
Technical Scope Summary
The document explicitly defines and regulates 'conversational artificial intelligence services' and 'artificial intelligence systems' accessible to the general public. It does not mention frontier AI, general purpose AI, foundation models, compute thresholds, or open-source models. The focus is on deployed conversational AI systems that simulate human interaction through adaptive communications.
Document data from AGORA, CSET Emerging Technology Observatory.