The Media Development Agency of Azerbaijan issued a warning regarding the circulation of AI-generated deepfake videos on social media. These videos falsely depicted the country's defense and foreign ministers discussing the alleged downing of a Belarusian aircraft in Russian airspace. The agency confirmed the content was fabricated using AI to manipulate public opinion and urged citizens to rely only on official sources.
Azerbaijan's Media Development Agency reported that purportedly AI-generated deepfake videos circulated on social media appearing to show statements by Azerbaijan's defense and foreign ministers (Zakir Hasanov and Jeyhun Bayramov, respectively) about the alleged downing of a Belarusian aircraft in Russian airspace. The agency reportedly denied the videos were authentic and called them an information manipulation effort aimed at misleading public opinion.
Risk classification
- Primary risk domain: 4 Malicious actors
- Primary risk subdomain: 4.1 Disinformation, surveillance, and influence at scale
The incident involves the intentional creation and dissemination of deepfake videos of high-ranking government officials to manipulate public opinion and spread geopolitical disinformation.
Additional risk subdomains
- 3.1 False or misleading information: The deepfake videos generated and spread false claims about a military incident involving a Belarusian aircraft.
Causal factors
- Entity: Human
- Intent: Intentional
- Timing: Post-deployment
The incident was caused by human actors intentionally creating and distributing deepfake videos post-deployment to manipulate public opinion.
EU AI Act risk tier
- Risk tier: 3 Limited Risk
Limited Risk: The incident involves AI-generated content, specifically deepfakes, which are subject to transparency obligations under the EU AI Act to ensure users are aware the content is synthetic.
AI system and alleged parties
- AI system: None named
- AI purpose: Deepfake Video Generation; Voice Generation
- Behaviour type: Tool
- Alleged developer: Unknown deepfake technology developers
- Alleged deployer: Unknown disinformation actors
- Alleged harmed parties: Zakir Hasanov, National security and intelligence stakeholders, Jeyhun Bayramov, Government of Azerbaijan, Epistemic integrity
Harm severity
Severity ratings are based on this scale.
Highest direct severity in any category: Minor. Severity is scored from Negligible to Catastrophic in each harm category, for harm the reports describe as caused directly or indirectly by the AI system.
- Physical: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
- Infrastructure: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
- Property: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
- Financial: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
- Environmental: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
- Malicious content: direct Minor, indirect Negligible
- Differential treatment: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
- Civil rights: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
- Democracy: direct Minor, indirect Minor
- Privacy: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
- Psychological: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
- Epistemic: direct Minor, indirect Minor
- Child sexual exploitation and abuse: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
Malicious content
Reported: The report explicitly describes the creation and spread of malicious deepfake videos designed to mislead public opinion.
Directly caused: AI-generated deepfake videos of the Azerbaijani Minister of Defence and Foreign Minister were created and circulated on social media.
Inferred additional harm: It is likely that additional unverified social media posts and discussions propagated the false claims, though specific numbers are not provided.
Democracy
Reported: The report explicitly describes information manipulation aimed at misleading public opinion, which threatens democratic norms and public trust.
Directly caused: The deepfake videos targeted high-ranking state officials to manipulate public opinion regarding national defense and foreign policy.
Indirectly caused: The incident forced state media agencies to issue urgent public warnings to maintain public trust and counter the disinformation.
Inferred additional harm: Such campaigns can erode long-term public trust in official communications and media ecosystems, though the scale of this impact is not quantified.
Epistemic
Reported: The report explicitly describes epistemic harm through the spread of fabricated video content and false claims.
Directly caused: The deepfake videos falsely claimed that a Belarusian aircraft was downed in Russian airspace, creating a fabricated geopolitical event.
Indirectly caused: The circulation of these videos on social media misled some members of the public before the official denial was issued.
Inferred additional harm: The incident contributes to the broader erosion of shared reality and trust in digital media, making it harder for citizens to distinguish real from synthetic content.
People affected
- Occurrences reported: 1
- People reportedly harmed: 2
- People reportedly exposed: 10000
Potential causes
Technology
- Deepfake Video Generation: AI was used to create highly realistic fake videos of public officials.
- Social Media Distribution: Social media platforms allowed rapid dissemination of the manipulated footage.
Data Inputs
- Official Likeness Exploitation: Publicly available video and audio of ministers were used to train AI models.
Human Factors
- Public Vulnerability to Deception: Social media users may easily believe realistic deepfakes without verification.
- Malicious Actor Intent: Individuals intentionally created fakes to manipulate public opinion.
Process and Methods
- Inadequate Content Verification: Social media platforms failed to flag or block the deepfake videos promptly.
Regulatory Environment
- Lack of Deepfake Regulation: Absence of strict legal frameworks governing AI-generated disinformation.
Information quality
- Classification confidence: High
- Reason for confidence: The reports from official Azerbaijani media sources clearly describe the nature of the incident, the specific officials targeted, the false claims made, and the technology used (deepfakes). There is no conflicting information regarding the falsity of the videos.
- Ambiguities identified: The specific AI tools or platforms used to generate the deepfakes are not identified, and the exact reach or number of views of the videos is not specified.
- Alternative interpretations: None. The event is clearly a state-targeted deepfake disinformation campaign.
AI-generated deepfake videos falsely depicted Azerbaijan's defense and foreign ministers discussing a sensitive military event involving Belarus and Russia. While the campaign targeted high-level officials to manipulate public opinion, prompt government denial mitigated the immediate national security impact, limiting it primarily to information warfare.
- Overall national security impact: Substantial
- Scope: Single nation
- Primary target: Azerbaijan
- Other affected: Belarus, Russia
- Alleged perpetrator: Unknown
Threat characteristics
- Imminence: Near-term. Requires ongoing monitoring to prevent further spread of the disinformation and potential diplomatic fallout.
- Autonomy: Human-controlled. AI was utilized strictly as a content generation tool directed entirely by human actors with no autonomous decision-making.
- Novelty: Established threat. The use of deepfakes for political disinformation and targeting public figures is an established and recurring threat.
Impact by dimension
- Physical security: Negligible. The incident did not involve kinetic attacks, physical systems, or threats to critical infrastructure.
- Information security: Substantial. Sophisticated deepfake campaign targeting the defense and foreign ministers with fabricated claims about a military incident, requiring an urgent official warning to counter the disinformation.
- Sovereignty: Minor. The campaign targeted high-ranking state officials to manipulate public opinion on national defense, but did not disrupt core government operations or decision-making.
- Economic security: Negligible. No strategic technology, financial systems, or economic infrastructure were compromised or targeted in this incident.
- Societal stability: Minor. The disinformation aimed to mislead the public and manipulate opinion, but did not result in widespread civil unrest or systematic rights violations.