Purportedly AI-Generated Jeffrey Epstein Video Reportedly Used by Pro-Iran Accounts to Claim Iran War Was Launched as a Cover-Up

During the Iran war, a network of anonymous accounts on X utilized AI-generated videos and images to spread disinformation, specifically linking U.S. and Israeli military actions to Epstein-related conspiracy theories. This campaign, which included antisemitic content, aimed to erode public support for military operations and influence global opinion. Researchers identified the network as part of a pro-Iran propaganda effort, noting that the AI-generated content was used to lend false credibility to these narratives.

During the Iran war, anonymous pro-Iran accounts on X including HDX News and GPX News reportedly circulated a purportedly AI-generated Jeffrey Epstein-themed video while claiming it was real and that U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran were launched to distract from Epstein-related material. The Washington Post reported the HDX News post received more than 6.8 million views and GPX News's version received more than 4.7 million before both accounts were suspended by X.

Source: AI Incident Database

Risk classification

  • Primary risk domain: 4 Malicious actors
  • Primary risk subdomain: 4.1 Disinformation, surveillance, and influence at scale

The incident involves a coordinated, state-aligned network using AI-generated deepfakes to conduct a large-scale disinformation campaign aimed at manipulating public opinion and political processes.

Additional risk subdomains

  • 1.2 Exposure to toxic content: The campaign generated and spread explicitly antisemitic and pro-Nazi content, exposing millions of social media users to hate speech.

Causal factors

  • Entity: Human
  • Intent: Intentional
  • Timing: Post-deployment

The incident was caused by human operators intentionally deploying AI-generated deepfakes as part of a coordinated propaganda campaign.

EU AI Act risk tier

  • Risk tier: 3 Limited Risk

Limited Risk: The incident involves 'AI-generated content such as deepfakes' used to spread disinformation. The report describes 'AI-generated fakes' and 'AI-generated videos' being spread on social media platforms without disclosure.

AI system and alleged parties

  • AI system: unspecified
  • AI purpose: Deepfake Video Generation; Social Media Content Generation
  • Behaviour type: Tool
  • Alleged developer: Unknown deepfake technology developers
  • Alleged deployer: Unknown pro-Iranian disinformation actors, Unknown disinformation actors, HDX News, GPX News
  • Alleged harmed parties: Jewish people, General public, Epistemic integrity, Donald Trump

Harm severity

Severity ratings are based on this scale.

Highest direct severity in any category: Severe. Severity is scored from Negligible to Catastrophic in each harm category, for harm the reports describe as caused directly or indirectly by the AI system.

  • Physical: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
  • Infrastructure: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
  • Property: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
  • Financial: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
  • Environmental: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
  • Malicious content: direct Minor, indirect Substantial
  • Differential treatment: direct Minor, indirect Minor
  • Civil rights: direct Negligible, indirect Minor
  • Democracy: direct Minor, indirect Minor
  • Privacy: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
  • Psychological: direct Negligible, indirect Minor
  • Epistemic: direct Severe, indirect Substantial
  • Child sexual exploitation and abuse: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible

Malicious content

Reported: The report explicitly describes AI-generated videos and images used to spread antisemitic, pro-Nazi, and graphic conspiracy content.

Directly caused: The campaign directly spread an AI-generated video of a Jewish man dancing in a graveyard and a fake video of Trump with Epstein.

Indirectly caused: The campaign prompted right-wing influencers to share related antisemitic conspiracy theories, such as claims that the U.S. is controlled by Jews.

Inferred additional harm: It is likely that millions of social media users were exposed to toxic antisemitic and pro-Nazi content generated or inspired by this campaign.

Differential treatment

Reported: The report explicitly describes targeted antisemitic harassment and propaganda against Jewish people.

Directly caused: The AI-generated content specifically targeted Jewish people, depicting them in a derogatory and conspiratorial manner.

Indirectly caused: The campaign fueled broader antisemitic narratives, leading to increased hostility and unequal safety conditions for Jewish individuals.

Inferred additional harm: Widespread dissemination of these deepfakes likely reinforced systemic biases and discriminatory attitudes against Jewish communities globally.

Civil rights

Reported: The report explicitly mentions threats, harassment, and violent attacks targeting Jewish people, which violate their civil rights.

Indirectly caused: The amplification of antisemitic propaganda indirectly led to harassment and threats that infringed upon the safety and civil rights of Jewish individuals.

Inferred additional harm: It is likely that numerous individuals experienced violations of their right to safety and freedom from discrimination due to the real-world harassment sparked by this campaign.

Democracy

Reported: The report explicitly describes a coordinated foreign influence campaign aimed at eroding public support for U.S.-Israel military operations and manipulating U.S. public opinion.

Directly caused: The pro-Iran network used AI-generated deepfakes to spread conspiracy theories to a global audience, attempting to influence political processes and public opinion.

Indirectly caused: The campaign successfully amplified divisive narratives, with U.S. political commentators resharing and validating the conspiracy theories.

Inferred additional harm: Coordinated foreign state-aligned disinformation campaigns using AI deepfakes pose a significant, ongoing threat to democratic discourse and public trust in democratic institutions.

Psychological

Reported: The report explicitly notes that the rise in antisemitic content is hurtful and accompanied by threats and harassment.

Indirectly caused: The spread of antisemitic and pro-Nazi propaganda caused distress, fear, and anxiety among Jewish communities targeted by the campaign.

Inferred additional harm: It is inferred that thousands of Jewish individuals experienced heightened anxiety and psychological distress due to the viral spread of antisemitic deepfakes and associated threats.

Epistemic

Reported: The report explicitly details the creation and viral spread of AI-generated fake videos and images designed to deceive the public.

Directly caused: The network spread a fake video showing Trump and other figures with Jeffrey Epstein, which was viewed over 11.5 million times, and fake videos of military conflicts.

Indirectly caused: The viral fakes contributed to the spread of the 'Epstein Fury' conspiracy theory, which was mentioned over 90,000 times on X within three days.

Inferred additional harm: The widespread circulation of highly realistic AI-generated fakes during an active conflict severely degrades the shared information ecosystem, making it difficult for the public to distinguish real events from fabrications.

People affected

  • Occurrences reported: 1
  • People reportedly harmed: 100
  • People reportedly exposed: 14100000

Potential causes

Management

  • Monetization of Engagement: Platform incentivized sensational AI content via creator revenue sharing.
  • Insufficient Safety Investment: Platform prioritized rapid feature rollout over robust AI safety guardrails.

Technology

  • AI Deepfake Generation Tools: Generative AI enabled creation of highly realistic fake videos and images.
  • Algorithmic Amplification: Recommendation algorithms prioritized engaging, controversial AI content.
  • Lack of Automated Detection: X lacked automated tools to instantly flag or block AI-generated fakes.

Data Inputs

  • Real Footage Mixed with AI: Combining real video with AI-generated scenes made disinformation look real.
  • Unlabeled AI Media: Lack of metadata or watermarks on AI content made tracking difficult.

Human Factors

  • User Confirmation Bias: Users shared AI fakes because the content aligned with existing beliefs.
  • Intentional Malicious Sharing: Influencers and state actors knowingly spread AI fakes to drive engagement.
  • Low Digital Literacy of Users: General public struggled to distinguish AI-generated deepfakes from reality.

Process and Methods

  • Slow Moderation Workflows: Platforms relied on delayed manual reviews and reports to remove AI fakes.
  • Inadequate Verification Process: Verification badge system allowed anonymous propaganda accounts to buy reach.
  • Delayed Policy Enforcement: New rules for AI-generated war videos were announced after viral spread.

Information quality

  • Classification confidence: High
  • Reason for confidence: The reports provide detailed, credible accounts from disinformation researchers (ISD, ADL, Atlantic Council) regarding the coordinated campaign, specific view counts, and the nature of the AI-generated content. The role of AI as a tool for generating deepfakes is clear, and the societal impacts are well-documented.
  • Ambiguities identified: The exact AI tools used to generate the videos and images are not specified, and the direct causal link between the online campaign and specific real-world violent attacks is described generally rather than with specific case details.
  • Alternative interpretations: The campaign could be viewed primarily as a geopolitical propaganda effort where AI was incidental, rather than an AI-specific safety failure.

A coordinated pro-Iran propaganda network utilized AI-generated deepfakes to conduct a high-impact information warfare campaign targeting the US and Israel during active military conflict. The campaign spread viral conspiracy theories and antisemitic content to erode public support for military actions, highlighting the evolving national security threat of AI-enabled disinformation.

  • Overall national security impact: Substantial
  • Scope: Multiple nations
  • Primary target: United States and Israel
  • Other affected: Iran
  • Alleged perpetrator: Pro-Iran propaganda network

Threat characteristics

  • Imminence: Near-term. Active propaganda campaign during an ongoing war requiring monitoring and rapid platform mitigation.
  • Autonomy: Human-controlled. AI was used as a tool by human operators who created, coordinated, and distributed the deepfakes.
  • Novelty: Evolved capability. Represents an evolved capability where generative AI video is deployed rapidly during active military conflicts to shape global narratives.

Impact by dimension

  • Physical security: Negligible. No kinetic attacks, critical infrastructure manipulation, or physical systems compromised by the AI-generated content.
  • Information security: Substantial. Coordinated pro-Iran network used AI-generated deepfakes to target US and Israeli military operations, accumulating over 14 million views to erode public support.
  • Sovereignty: Substantial. Foreign influence campaign designed to undermine government decision-making and public support during an active military conflict.
  • Economic security: Negligible. No strategic technology theft, financial market manipulation, or critical supply chain disruptions reported.
  • Societal stability: Substantial. Viral spread of antisemitic and pro-Nazi AI content fueled online harassment and increased threats of real-world violence against Jewish communities.
Explore in the interactive Incident Tracker