AI-generated videos were circulated on Facebook depicting fabricated tense exchanges between Kosovo's Prime Minister Albin Kurti and former President Vjosa Osmani. These videos, which appeared during the lead-up to the June 2026 snap elections, utilized unnatural body movements and mismatched synthetic voices. Fact-checkers confirmed the content was AI-generated, noting that the videos repurposed footage from previous events to create a false narrative of conflict between the two political figures.
Purportedly AI-generated Facebook videos reportedly fabricated tense exchanges between Kosovo leaders Albin Kurti and Vjosa Osmani before the June 7, 2026 snap elections. The videos allegedly used prior images and had unnatural body movements, as well as purportedly mismatched synthetic voices.
Risk classification
- Primary risk domain: 4 Malicious actors
- Primary risk subdomain: 4.1 Disinformation, surveillance, and influence at scale
The incident involved the coordinated creation and dissemination of AI-generated political deepfakes on Facebook to influence public opinion and political processes during an election campaign.
Additional risk subdomains
- 3.1 False or misleading information: The AI system was used to generate fabricated videos and synthetic voices that spread false information about political figures.
Causal factors
- Entity: Human
- Intent: Intentional
- Timing: Post-deployment
The incident was initiated by human actors who intentionally used deployed AI tools to generate and spread deceptive political deepfakes.
EU AI Act risk tier
- Risk tier: 3 Limited Risk
Limited Risk: The incident involves AI-generated content such as deepfakes, which are subject to specific transparency obligations under the EU AI Act.
AI system and alleged parties
- AI system: unspecified
- AI purpose: Deepfake Video Generation; Voice Generation
- Behaviour type: Tool
- Alleged developer: Voice cloning technology, Synthetic audio technology, Deepfake technology developers
- Alleged deployer: Information manipulation actors in Kosovo, Information manipulation actors, Deepfake creators
- Alleged harmed parties: Voters in Kosovo, Voters, Vjosa Osmani, Social media users, General public of Kosovo, General public, Facebook users in Kosovo, Facebook users, Epistemic integrity, Democratic integrity, Albin Kurti
Harm severity
Severity ratings are based on this scale.
Highest direct severity in any category: Minor. Severity is scored from Negligible to Catastrophic in each harm category, for harm the reports describe as caused directly or indirectly by the AI system.
- Physical: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
- Infrastructure: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
- Property: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
- Financial: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
- Environmental: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
- Malicious content: direct Minor, indirect Negligible
- Differential treatment: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
- Civil rights: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
- Democracy: direct Minor, indirect Negligible
- Privacy: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
- Psychological: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
- Epistemic: direct Minor, indirect Negligible
- Child sexual exploitation and abuse: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
Malicious content
Reported: The report explicitly describes toxic or malicious content created and spread directly by the incident.
Directly caused: The Facebook page 'Kosova Info' published three fabricated videos of Albin Kurti and Vjosa Osmani depicting them in conflict.
Democracy
Reported: The report explicitly describes the erosion of democratic norms caused directly and indirectly by the incident.
Directly caused: Fabricated videos of the Prime Minister and former President in conflict were spread during the electoral campaign for the snap elections.
Inferred additional harm: The dissemination of deepfakes of key political leaders during an election likely erodes trust in democratic processes and misleads voters.
Epistemic
Reported: The report explicitly describes epistemic harm caused directly by the incident.
Directly caused: Three videos with fabricated conversations and synthetic voices were published on Facebook to mislead the public.
Inferred additional harm: Such deepfakes contribute to the erosion of shared truth and make it harder for citizens to distinguish real political statements from fabricated ones.
People affected
- Occurrences reported: 1
- People reportedly harmed: 2
- People reportedly exposed: 2
Potential causes
Management
- Inadequate Platform Oversight: Facebook page management allowed unverified political deepfakes to be posted.
Technology
- AI Deepfake Generation Tools: AI tools allowed fabrication of realistic video and voice clones of politicians.
- Unnatural Body and Voice Synthesis: Algorithms generated unnatural body movements and mismatched voices in videos.
Data Inputs
- Use of Public Event Photos: Publicly available images from official events were used to train the AI.
- Political Agreement Footage: Footage from past joint political appearances was used to fabricate conflict.
Human Factors
- Intentional Political Deception: Actors deliberately created deepfakes to mislead voters during elections.
- Audience Susceptibility: Social media users may believe realistic political confrontations.
Process and Methods
- Algorithmic Moderation Gaps: Facebook processes failed to proactively block AI-generated political fakes.
- Delayed Fact-Checking Detection: Verification occurred only after the fabricated videos had circulated online.
Regulatory Environment
- Lack of Deepfake Regulation: Absence of strict legal frameworks governing AI-generated political content.
Information quality
- Classification confidence: High
- Reason for confidence: The report clearly details the nature of the incident, the specific political figures targeted, the platform used (Facebook), and the fact-checking process that confirmed the videos were AI-generated deepfakes.
- Ambiguities identified: The specific AI tools used to generate the videos and voices are not identified.
- Alternative interpretations: None. The incident is a straightforward case of political deepfakes used for election disinformation.
AI-generated deepfake videos targeting Kosovo's Prime Minister and former President were circulated during an election campaign to manipulate voters. While quickly debunked and causing no physical harm, the incident represents a substantial attempt to disrupt sovereignty and democratic government processes using synthetic media.
- Overall national security impact: Substantial
- Scope: Single nation
- Primary target: Kosovo
- Alleged perpetrator: Unknown
Threat characteristics
- Imminence: Near-term. The incident occurred during an active election campaign, representing a developing situation requiring monitoring up to the election day.
- Autonomy: Human-controlled. The AI tools were used strictly as instruments by human creators to generate specific synthetic media, with no autonomous decision-making.
- Novelty: Established threat. Political deepfakes targeting election candidates are an established method of disinformation seen in numerous global elections.
Impact by dimension
- Physical security: Negligible. No physical systems, critical infrastructure, or human safety were threatened or affected.
- Information security: Minor. AI-generated disinformation targeted political leaders on social media, but it was quickly debunked by fact-checkers and lacked indications of advanced state-sponsored intelligence compromise.
- Sovereignty: Substantial. The deepfakes targeted the head of government and a former president during a sensitive snap election period, directly aiming to manipulate democratic electoral processes.
- Economic security: Negligible. No financial systems, strategic industries, or technological advantages were targeted or impacted.
- Societal stability: Minor. The incident attempted to mislead voters and erode trust in democratic processes, but did not result in mass civil unrest or systemic human rights violations.