Purportedly AI-Manipulated Videos Reportedly Targeted Former Kosovo MP Paris Guri and LDK Youth Members Before Snap Elections

AI-manipulated videos were used to target former Kosovo MP Paris Guri and LDK Youth Forum members ahead of the June 2026 snap elections. The videos, which were verified as AI-fabricated by the detection platform Hive, depicted youth members holding milk bottles and fabricated statements by Guri. These posts were identified as part of a disinformation effort during the election campaign period.

Purportedly AI-manipulated Facebook videos reportedly targeted former Kosovo MP Paris Guri and LDK Youth Forum members before Kosovo's June 7, 2026 snap elections. One video allegedly altered an original LDK image to show youth members holding milk bottles, while another reportedly fabricated Guri making a pro-Kurti statement.

Source: AI Incident Database

Risk classification

  • Primary risk domain: 4 Malicious actors
  • Primary risk subdomain: 4.1 Disinformation, surveillance, and influence at scale

The AI-manipulated videos were deployed as part of a coordinated political disinformation effort to influence public opinion and manipulate democratic processes ahead of snap elections.

Additional risk subdomains

  • 4.3 Fraud, scams, and targeted manipulation: The videos targeted specific individuals, including Paris Guri and LDK youth members, to humiliate them and manipulate public perception of their character.
  • 3.1 False or misleading information: The AI system was used to generate entirely fabricated statements and visual depictions that misled social media users.

Causal factors

  • Entity: Human
  • Intent: Intentional
  • Timing: Post-deployment

The incident was caused by human actors intentionally using generative AI tools post-deployment to create and distribute deceptive political deepfakes.

EU AI Act risk tier

  • Risk tier: 3 Limited Risk

Limited Risk: The incident involves AI-generated content such as deepfakes, which are subject to specific transparency obligations under the EU AI Act.

AI system and alleged parties

  • AI system: Hive, unspecified (Hive)
  • AI purpose: Deepfake Video Generation; Voice Generation
  • Behaviour type: Tool
  • Alleged developer: Video generation technology developers, Synthetic media technology developers, Deepfake technology developers
  • Alleged deployer: Synthetic media creators, Information manipulation actors in Kosovo, Information manipulation actors, Deepfake creators
  • Alleged harmed parties: Voters in Kosovo, Voters, Social media users, Paris Guri, Kosovo parliamentary candidates, General public of Kosovo, General public, Facebook users in Kosovo, Facebook users, Epistemic integrity, Democratic League of Kosovo Youth Forum, Democratic League of Kosovo, Democratic integrity

Harm severity

Highest direct severity in any category: Minor. Severity is scored from Negligible to Catastrophic in each harm category, for harm the reports describe as caused directly or indirectly by the AI system.

  • Physical: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
  • Infrastructure: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
  • Property: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
  • Financial: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
  • Environmental: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
  • Malicious content: direct Minor, indirect Negligible
  • Differential treatment: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
  • Civil rights: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
  • Democracy: direct Minor, indirect Negligible
  • Privacy: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
  • Psychological: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible
  • Epistemic: direct Minor, indirect Negligible
  • Child sexual exploitation and abuse: direct Negligible, indirect Negligible

Malicious content

Reported: The report describes the creation and spread of malicious, manipulated political content on Facebook.

Directly caused: AI-manipulated videos were created to mock LDK youth members as children and fabricate a political statement by Paris Guri.

Indirectly caused: N/A

Inferred additional harm: The malicious content was shared on Facebook, exposing an unknown number of social media users to political mockery and manipulation.

Democracy

Reported: The report describes the dissemination of fabricated political videos during an active election campaign period.

Directly caused: AI-fabricated videos of political figures were spread on Facebook ahead of snap elections to manipulate voter perception.

Indirectly caused: N/A

Inferred additional harm: The use of synthetic media to mislead voters during elections threatens the integrity of democratic processes and erodes public trust in political institutions.

Epistemic

Reported: The report explicitly describes epistemic harm through the creation of fabricated videos and statements.

Directly caused: The videos falsely depicted youth members holding milk bottles and fabricated a spoken statement by Paris Guri.

Indirectly caused: N/A

Inferred additional harm: The spread of realistic deepfakes pollutes the information ecosystem, making it harder for citizens to distinguish real political discourse from synthetic fabrications.

People affected

  • Occurrences reported: 2
  • People reportedly harmed: 6
  • People reportedly exposed: 6

Potential causes

Technology

  • AI Video Manipulation Tools: Advanced AI tools allowed realistic editing of videos to depict false events.
  • High-Fidelity Voice Synthesis: AI synthesized the politician's voice to make false statements sound real.

Data Inputs

  • Misuse of Original Media: Authentic photos of LDK members were used as inputs for AI manipulation.

Human Factors

  • Malicious Intent of Publisher: An actor intentionally created deepfakes to manipulate public opinion.
  • Political Polarization: Electoral tension motivated creators to target opposition political figures.

Process and Methods

  • Lack of Platform Pre-Screening: Facebook allowed immediate publishing of AI-manipulated media without checks.
  • Delayed Detection and Verification: Fact-checking and HIVE analysis only occurred after the video went viral.

Regulatory Environment

  • Weak Social Media Regulation: Absence of strict legal penalties for distributing political deepfakes.
  • Lack of AI Election Safeguards: Insufficient regulatory frameworks to protect elections from AI manipulation.

Information quality

  • Classification confidence: High
  • Reason for confidence: The report provides clear, verified details about the targeted individuals, the platform used to detect the manipulation (Hive), and the political context. The facts are well-documented by the fact-checking organization Krypometer.
  • Ambiguities identified: The specific generative AI model used to create the deepfakes is not identified in the report.

AI-manipulated videos targeting political figures in Kosovo ahead of snap elections represent a localized political disinformation effort. While leveraging synthetic media to influence voter perception during sensitive democratic processes, the incident had minor national security impact and was quickly identified by fact-checking platforms.

  • Overall national security impact: Minor
  • Response level: Moderate
  • Scope: Single nation
  • Primary target: Kosovo
  • Alleged perpetrator: Unknown

Threat characteristics

  • Imminence: Near-term. Disinformation campaign active during an election cycle requiring near-term monitoring and mitigation.
  • Autonomy: Human-controlled. Generative AI tools were directly operated by human actors to create specific synthetic video and audio assets.
  • Novelty: Established threat. The use of generative AI for political deepfakes and social media disinformation is an established threat method.

Impact by dimension

  • Physical security: Negligible. No physical threats, kinetic weapons, or critical infrastructure manipulation reported in the incident.
  • Information security: Minor. Localized political disinformation campaign using deepfakes to mock candidates, but without sophisticated coordination or intelligence compromise.
  • Sovereignty: Minor. Targeted political figures during a sensitive election period, but did not disrupt electoral infrastructure or core government decision-making.
  • Economic security: Negligible. No threats to financial systems, strategic industries, or technological competitive advantage.
  • Societal stability: Minor. Targeted political defamation on social media could slightly erode public trust, but did not cause mass civil unrest or systematic violations.
Explore in the interactive Incident Tracker